paybondpaybond
Sign in

Paybond vs PayGraph

When to use Paybond Kit instead of, or alongside, PayGraph for agent spend policies, audit logs, evidence, settlement, refunds, and disputes.

In short: PayGraph is an open-source policy layer for agent spending and gateway integrations. Paybond is the SDK to reach for when a paid tool call also needs a spend limit checked before it runs, proof the work happened, and a signed receipt afterward — so you do not build that spend-governance middleware yourself. It works across agent runtimes and covers authorization, evidence, receipts, settlement, refunds, and disputes around paid tool calls.

Decision table

RequirementPaybond KitPayGraph
Pre-execution spend authorization for paid toolsBest fitBest fit for policy-controlled spend requests
One-time permission slip (capability token) tied to a signed agreement, scoped to a single operationBest fitNot the core model
Proof the work happened, checked before money movesBest fitAudit-log oriented
Release, refund, review, or dispute based on that proofBest fitNot the core settlement lifecycle
LangGraph-first spend tool with policy checksWorks through wrapper/adapterStrong fit
Payment gateway abstraction for card-style spendRail-adjacentStrong fit
Cross-runtime guard for OpenAI, Claude, Gemini, MCP, LangGraph, and custom runtimesBest fitStrongest fit for LangGraph-centric workflows

Practical rule

Use PayGraph when you want an open-source policy layer around agent spending and gateway integrations. Use Paybond when the application also needs a signed spend agreement, per-operation permission checks, structured proof of work, audit-ready receipts, settlement state, refunds, and disputes.

References